
02:38 on oma suosikkini

Moderator: The Killer Krew
Tuskin kannattaa, minuutin jaksoin ja totesin, että toinen noista top commentseista kertonee koko roskan idean.darealjyra wrote:Täytyy tsekkailla kyllä kotona äänien kanssa, loistavia kommentteja kyllä tolla videolla.
nhonho23 wrote:Yes, after you've been fired from your band and exposed to the world as an narcissistic, violent, manipulative motherfucker, the best thing you can do to promote yourself is make a video telling the world how great your are.
Huh. There´s something seriously wrong with this gay, eh guy.Jyyd wrote:Juuri kun luulin ettei Geoff voisi enää alemmaksi mennä niin sitten naamani eteen pamahta tämä GT EPK -video. Ei herranjumala mitä settiä
02:38 on oma suosikkini
"He's Geoff Tate - The most interesting man in the world. He lives vicariously through himself. He bowls overhand. He once brought a knife to a gunfight, just to even the odds. He can line dance in a circle. Mosquitoes refuse to bite him purely out of respect. He has inside jokes with complete strangers. He is..... The most interesting man in the world. "
Oma suosikkini on tuo loppussa oleva historiakertaus, josta olen lainannut pari riviä :Iron Constable wrote:Huh. There´s something seriously wrong with this gay, eh guy.Jyyd wrote:Juuri kun luulin ettei Geoff voisi enää alemmaksi mennä niin sitten naamani eteen pamahta tämä GT EPK -video. Ei herranjumala mitä settiä
02:38 on oma suosikkini
Tyhmempi voisi kuvitella että tämä perseily on vetänyt QR:n nimen niin lokaan että paremmat saumat olisi bändillä jonka nimessä EI missään kohtaa lukisi "Queensrÿche".darealjyra wrote:^Kannattaa muistaa että moraalisilla oikeuksilla ei ole mitään tekemistä oikean elämän kanssa. Sama oikeus Geoffilla on tota nimeä käyttää markkinoinnissa (mut tuskin levyä voi laittaa ulos pelkällä Queensrÿche-nimellä, vaan se on jotain Geoff Tate of Queensrÿche tms.) kuin muillakin jampoilla, koska oikeuden eteen tässä GT vs. MW/SR/EJ-keississä astellaan vasta marraskuussa 2013.
Bisneksen kannalta hyvin järkevä ratkaisu, sillä varmasti löytyy sitä kansaa jonka mielestä Rÿche = Silent Lucidity ja Geoff Tate sen laulajana ainoa oikea, ja tällä erittäin odotetulla ratkaisulla vain varmistetaan se että tämä porukka seuraa Geoffin mukana.
Peukut pystyyn ja sormet solmuun.We will have a special guest with us for the show on October 27th in WA - hope to see you there!
JA vieras on...... NOT Chris DeGarmo, but Pamela Moore.Bahamut wrote:Naamakirjassa:Peukut pystyyn ja sormet solmuun.We will have a special guest with us for the show on October 27th in WA - hope to see you there!
No perhana, pidän toiveeni silti yllä sen suhteen että DeGarmo vielä joskus tulee yhdessä lavalle tämän kokoonpanon kanssa missä on suurin osa alkuperäisjäsenistä. Kyllähän tuo muutenkin jostain kertoo että Moore ei valinnut Taten cover-bändiä vaan päätti esiintyä paremman version kanssa livenä.Risto Malinen wrote:JA vieras on...... NOT Chris DeGarmo, but Pamela Moore.Bahamut wrote:Naamakirjassa:Peukut pystyyn ja sormet solmuun.We will have a special guest with us for the show on October 27th in WA - hope to see you there!
No toki, mainitaanhan se W.A.S.P.in Blind In Texasissakin!Bahamut wrote:Tuota Corpus Christin (paikan nimi?)
sanoiko joku tuolla kommeteissa tuoreemman, aikuisemman lyriikkansa sisältävän lauseen she rides me like excercise machineGEOFF TATE: Why I Don't Enjoy Singing 'Queen Of The Reich' Anymore - Nov. 20, 2012
Joseph Suto of Rock Show Critique recently conducted an interview with QUEENSRŸCHE vocalist Geoff Tate. A couple of excerpts from the chat follow below.
Rock Show Critique: [QUEENSRŸCHE's] "Queen Of The Reich" has been one of your most popular tunes, yet over the past several years, you rarely played it live. Was that by choice or is it just a harder song to sing?
Geoff Tate: Actually, it's not very popular at all. It's funny, actually — a lot of people don't know about that song. A lot of people don't care about that song. It's an early song that was written and it shows. It's funny the reaction you get, because it's a lot of blank stares. In fact, it's the same stare you get when you play a new song that nobody's heard before. People just aren't that familiar with it. Given there are a few hardcore fans that might know that song, or like that song, and know what it is, but the majority of the people there don't. So it's not really a song that I enjoy singing, strictly because, lyrically, it's pretty adolescent. It was the first song written thirty-some-odd years ago and obviously I cannot relate to it anymore. I think, for performance, it's always best for the performer to really believe in the material they're singing or playing. If you don't believe in it, it's really difficult to get behind a song, do it well and do it at a level that comes across with any kind of believability. For me, I honestly can't relate to the whole dungeons-and-dragons lyrical content of that song; it's really cartoonish and juvenile to me.